Archives mensuelles : septembre 2018
“Samuel Chase (April 17, 1741 – June 19, 1811) was an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court and a signatory to the United States Declaration of Independence as a representative of Maryland. He was impeached on grounds of letting his partisan leanings affect his court decisions […].”
posted in tempore non suspecto
If Mark Judge says you often behaved like a self-repressed homosexual, would he be lying, you vicious queen ?
If Donald Trump says you licked his fat ass in the Oval Office area, would he be lying, you biased slut ?
If Monica Lewinsky says the cigar, the ejaculation as well as the fingerjob were consensual adult business, would she be lying, you arrogant unrepentant motherfucker ?
“If Monica Lewinsky says that you inserted a cigar into her vagina while you were in the Oval Office area, would she be lying?”
“If Monica Lewinsky says that you ejaculated in her mouth on two occasions in the Oval Office area, would she be lying?”
“If Monica Lewinsky says that on several occasions in the Oval Office area, you used your fingers to stimulate her vagina and bring her to orgasm, would she be lying?”
To impeach the POTUS, a 2/3rd-majority is required. Such a majority is also required to impeach a SCOTUS associate Justice. But why is that ? Whereas both the assumption that a simple majority of senators cannot undo the (supposed) will of the people and political stability vindicate the need for a broader majority in the former case, they do not in the latter : if a simple majority in the Senate is enough to confirm a new Justice, a simple majority, whereby the same institution would undo what it has done, should also suffice to impeach them. Therefore, the current requirement is nothing less than a constitutional aberration : associate Justices should only be confirmed by a 2/3rd majority…